Scale with AI / Episode 28 / October 31, 2026
Scale with AI — October 31, 2026
Your website just got a choice most owners have never been offered: who may train on your content, and who may quote it to a customer. Those are two different doors. This week: the shared opt-out signal the big AI companies agreed to honor, why it is a pledge and not a law, and how the businesses being recommended by AI assistants built their front door for it.

Quick Take
- The Shift: four of the biggest AI companies agreed to honor one shared signal that lets a website owner say, in one place, do not train on my content. Training on your words and quoting your business to a customer are two different things, and the smart position answers them differently.
- The Law: the opt-out is a voluntary pledge, not a law. It arrives on a staggered schedule into 2027, covers only future training, and the companies themselves warn it may reduce how often you surface in AI answers. The calling rules are unchanged: consent, honest identification, an immediate opt-out, legal hours.
- Who's doing it: an October survey of more than two thousand small businesses found most now use AI somewhere and say it helps, yet only about one in six users have it woven into core operations. The gap shows up as invisible websites and unapproved tools, and both are fixable.
The Shift
This week, four of the biggest AI companies agreed to honor a single, shared signal that lets a website owner say, in one place, do not use my content to train your models. Until now, an owner who cared had to chase every crawler separately, each with different rules, and most owners simply never did it. Every website carries a small instruction file for automated visitors, a sign on the door that robots read before people do. The new agreement adds one common line to that sign that all four companies say they will respect: one decision, written once. But training your content into a model and quoting your content to a customer are two completely different things. Training means your words help build the system itself. Quoting means a customer asks who to call for a job in their town, and the assistant fetches your page in that moment and recommends you by name, with your hours, your services, and your phone number. An owner who blocks everything has protected their content and disappeared from the answers. An owner who blocks nothing has given away the training value and kept the visibility. The smart position is the middle one: say no to training if that is your choice, and say yes, loudly, to being found, quoted, and recommended. That takes a site built for it: answer-first pages, clear facts, consistent names and numbers, so an assistant can quote you accurately instead of guessing.
The Fine Print
Three limits, in plain English. First, this agreement is a voluntary pledge, not a law. Nobody fines a company for ignoring it today. Second, it arrives on a staggered schedule: one company says it has already started, another says the coming months, and the others point to 2027. It covers only future training, does not undo anything already collected, and does not stop a visit to your site for search or for answering a customer's question. Third, a warning that came straight from the companies themselves: turning off training may also lower the chances your content shows up inside AI experiences. That trade-off is exactly why this should be a deliberate decision made with advice, not a switch flipped because a headline scared you. And the calling rules have not changed: if AI calls or records for your business, consent, honest identification, an immediate way to opt out, and legal calling hours still govern everything, and here in Washington everyone on a call must agree before it is recorded. A political calling waiver is being debated ahead of Tuesday's elections, but as of today it is a debate, not a rule your business can rely on.
Who’s Doing It
Today the story is the gap itself. A major October survey of more than two thousand small businesses found that the overwhelming majority now use AI somewhere in the business, and almost all of them say it helps. Yet only a small fraction, roughly one in six of those using it, say AI is actually woven into their core operations. Everyone else is experimenting at the edges. You can see that gap in two everyday patterns. In the first, an owner asks why a competitor keeps getting recommended by assistants while they do not. The site looks fine to a human eye, but it was built only for human eyes: the answers are buried, the facts are inconsistent from page to page, and the instruction file was never touched. Rebuild it answer-first, clean up the facts, set the training and discovery choices on purpose, and the same business becomes the one being quoted. Same company, same reviews, different front door. In the second pattern, an owner discovers staff have quietly adopted half a dozen AI tools on their own, with customer information flowing into accounts nobody approved. Nothing bad has happened yet, and that is precisely the point. The businesses getting this right chose a small number of tools on purpose, set the rules in writing, and integrated them into how the work actually flows. That is the difference between using AI and running on it.
Your Move
Three steps this week. First, decide your website's position on purpose. Do you want your content used for training? Do you want to be quoted and recommended in AI answers? Those are separate answers, and both should be yours, not an accident of a file nobody has opened in years. Second, make your site quotable. Put the answer first on every important page, and keep your name, your services, your service area, and your phone number identical everywhere they appear. An assistant can only recommend you confidently when your own facts agree with each other. Third, take a quiet inventory of the AI tools already inside your business, including the ones nobody officially bought. Write down what each one touches, especially anything involving customer information, and retire or approve each one in writing. It takes an afternoon, and it closes the widest open door most small businesses have right now. This is exactly the work we do at The Agency: websites AI assistants find, quote, and recommend, the training and discovery choices set deliberately for each business, and a small number of AI tools integrated into real operations, with rules. Start with a free AI Audit at theagencyllc.net and tell us you heard it on Scale with AI.
Key Takeaways
- Training on your content and quoting your business to a customer are two different doors. Decide each one on purpose.
- The new shared opt-out is a voluntary pledge, not a law: staggered into 2027, future training only, and it may reduce your visibility in AI answers.
- Most small businesses now use AI, but only about one in six users have it woven into core operations. The gap is the opportunity.
- Make your site quotable: answer first on every page, and keep name, services, area, and phone number identical everywhere.
- Inventory every AI tool in the building, including the unofficial ones, and approve or retire each in writing.
Full transcript
Alex: Welcome to Scale with AI for Saturday, October thirty-first, twenty twenty-six. I am Alex.
Jordan: And I am Jordan. Today, your website just got a new choice, and it is one most owners have never been offered before. Who is allowed to learn from your site, who is allowed to quote it to a customer, and why those two answers should probably be different.
Alex: That is our lead today, your website in the age of AI answers. Not phones, not ads, your front door, because for a growing number of customers, your website is no longer the first thing they see. The answer an assistant gives them, built partly from your site, is.
Jordan: Let us start with The Shift. This week, four of the biggest AI companies agreed to honor a single, shared signal that lets a website owner say, in one place, do not use my content to train your models. Until now, an owner who cared about this had to chase every crawler separately, with different rules for each company, and most owners simply never did it.
Alex: Here is how it works, in plain terms. Every website carries a small instruction file for automated visitors. Think of it as a sign on the door that robots read before people do. The new agreement adds one common line to that sign that all four companies say they will respect. One decision, written once, instead of a dozen separate ones.
Jordan: But, and this is the part that matters, training your content into a model and quoting your content to a customer are two completely different things. Training means your words help build the system itself. Quoting means a customer asks, who should I call for this job in my town, and the assistant fetches your page in that moment and recommends you by name, with your hours, your services, and your phone number.
Alex: An owner who blocks everything has protected their content and disappeared from the answers. An owner who blocks nothing has given away the training value and kept the visibility. The smart position, the one we build for, is the middle one. Say no to training if that is your choice, and say yes, loudly and clearly, to being found, quoted, and recommended. That requires your site to be built for it, answer first pages, clear facts, consistent names and numbers, so an assistant can quote you accurately instead of guessing.
Jordan: Now The Law, because owners deserve the limits in plain English too. This agreement is a voluntary pledge, not a law. Nobody fines a company for ignoring it today. It also arrives on a staggered schedule. One company says it has already started, another says the coming months, and the others point to twenty twenty-seven. It covers only future training. It does not undo anything already collected, and it does not stop a visit to your site for search or for answering a question.
Alex: And one warning came straight from the companies themselves. Turning off training may also lower the chances your content shows up inside AI experiences. That trade off is exactly why this should be a deliberate decision for your business, made with advice, not a switch you flip because a headline scared you.
Jordan: The calling rules we cover most weeks have not changed, so we will keep this short. If AI calls or records for your business, consent, honest identification, an immediate way to opt out, and legal calling hours still govern everything, and here in Washington, everyone on a call must agree before it is recorded. There is a political calling waiver being debated in Washington, D C, ahead of Tuesday's elections, but as of today it is still a debate, not a rule your business can rely on.
Alex: On to Who's Doing It, and today the story is the gap itself. A major October survey of more than two thousand small businesses found that the overwhelming majority now use AI somewhere in the business, and almost all of them say it helps. Yet only a small fraction, roughly one in six of those using it, say AI is actually woven into their core operations. Everyone else is experimenting at the edges.
Jordan: You can see that gap in two everyday patterns. In the first, an owner asks us to look at their website because a competitor keeps getting recommended by assistants and they do not. The site itself is fine to a human eye. But it was built only for human eyes. The answers are buried, the facts are inconsistent from page to page, and the instruction file was never touched. We rebuild it answer first, clean up the facts, set the training and discovery choices on purpose, and now the same business is the one being quoted. Same company, same reviews, different front door.
Alex: In the second pattern, an owner discovers that staff have quietly adopted half a dozen AI tools on their own, with customer information flowing into accounts nobody approved. Nothing bad has happened yet, and that is precisely the point. The businesses getting this right chose a small number of tools on purpose, set the rules in writing, and integrated them into how the work actually flows. That is the difference between using AI and running on it.
Jordan: Which brings us to Your Move. Three steps this week. First, decide your website's position on purpose. Do you want your content used for training? Do you want to be quoted and recommended in AI answers? Those are separate answers, and both should be yours, not an accident of a file nobody has opened in years.
Alex: Second, make your site quotable. Put the answer first on every important page. Keep your name, your services, your service area, and your phone number identical everywhere they appear. An assistant can only recommend you confidently when your own facts agree with each other.
Jordan: Third, take a quiet inventory of the AI tools already inside your business, including the ones nobody officially bought. Write down what each one touches, especially anything involving customer information, and retire or approve each one in writing. It takes an afternoon, and it closes the widest open door most small businesses have right now.
Alex: This is exactly the work we do at The Agency. We build websites that AI assistants find, quote, and recommend, we set the training and discovery choices deliberately for each business, and we integrate a small number of AI tools into your real operations, with rules, instead of a pile of experiments. If you want to know where your business stands, start with a free AI audit at theagencyllc dot net. Tell us you heard it on Scale with AI, and we will show you what an assistant sees when it looks at your business today.
Jordan: That is Scale with AI for October thirty-first. Your content, your choice, and your front door, rebuilt for how customers actually find you now. We will see you tomorrow.
Sources
Your next conversation